Formulation
and Evaluation of Itraconazole Emulgel
for Topical Drug Delivery
Anuradha A Sawant*, S.K. Mohite.
Department
of Quality Assurance, Rajarmbapu College of Pharmacy,
Kasegaon, Dist: Sangli,
Maharashtra, India
*Corresponding
Author E-mail: anuradhasawant91@gmail.com
ABSTRACT:
The aim of the present research work was to investigate the potential of emulgel in enhancing the topical delivery of Itraconazole. Emulgel
formulations of Itraconazole were prepared using two
types of gelling agents namely: Carbopol 934 and Carbopol 940. The influence of the type of the gelling
agent and the concentration of both the oil phase and emulsifying agent on the
drug release from the prepared emulgel was
investigated using a 23 factorial design. The prepared formulations were
evaluated for their physical appearance, viscosity, drug release, globule size,
skin irritation test, antifungal activity, transmission electron microscopy and
stability. Commercially available Itraconazole cream
was used for comparison. All the prepared emulgel
showed acceptable physical properties concerning color, homogeneity,
consistency, spreadability, and pH value. The
antifungal activity and drug release were found to be higher for optimized
formulation as compared to the marketed Itraconazole
cream. The result of studied revealed that the optimized batch shows 95.08%
release in 48 hours and stable for around three. The result of microbial assay
compared with marketed product, the result shows46.6% inhibition of optimized
batch where as marketed preparation shows only 32.3% inhibition. While result
of skin irritation test shows no edema and erythema.
No irritation was observed on the skin of the rabbits. Stability studies showed
that the physical appearance, rheological study, in vitro drug release, and
antifungal activity in all the prepared emulgel
remained unchanged upon storage for 3 months. In general conclusion, it was
suggested that the emulgel formulation succeed the
drug release for sustained drug delivery in a controlled manner in comparison
with cream.
KEY WORDS: Emulgel, Itraconazole.
INTRODUCTION:
Emulgel are
emulsions, either of the oil-in-water or water in oil type, which are gelled by
mixing with a gelling agent. Emulsified gel is stable one and better vehicle
for hydrophobic or poorly water soluble drugs [1]. They have a high
patient acceptability since they possess the advantages Topical drug delivery
and antifungal activity of both emulsions and gels. Direct (oil-in-water)
systems are used to entrap lipophilic drugs, whereas
hydrophilic drugs are encapsulated in the reverse (water-in-oil) systems [2].
Therefore, they have been recently used as vehicles to deliver various
hydrophobic drugs to the skin.
In the local market, 2 Emulgel are available: Voltaren emulgel (Novartis Pharma,
Switzerland), containing diclofenac diethylamine and Miconaz-H emulgel (Medical Union Pharmaceuticals, Egypt), containing miconazole nitrate and hydrocortisone [3].
Topical drug administration
is a localized drug delivery Topical drug administration is a localized drug
delivery system anywhere in the body through ophthalmic, rectal, vaginal and
skin as topical routes. Skin is one of the most readily accessible organs on
human body for topical administration and is main route of topical drug
delivery system. The emulsion gels are hydrogels
containing randomly distributed oil microdroplets.[4-9] Topical drug delivery systems
have been used for centuries for the treatment of local skin disorders, one
side the topical applications of the drug offer the potential advantages of
delivering the drug directly to the site of action and delivering the drug for
extended period of time at the effected site that mainly acts at the related
regions[10-14]. On the other hand, topical delivery system increases
the contact time and mean resident time of drug at the applied site leading to
an increase in local drug concentration while the pharmacological activity of Emulgel formulations may not change as rapidly as the
solution form [15]. Several antifungal agents are available on the
market in different topical preparations (e.g. creams, ointments, and powders
for the purpose of local dermatological therapy)[16-18].One
of these antifungal agents is Itraconazole, which has
both antifungal and antibacterial properties. It is applied locally in mild
uncomplicated dermatophyte and other cutaneous infections [19-20].
Both oil-in-water and
water-in-oil emulsions are extensively used for their therapeutic properties
and as vehicles to deliver various drugs to the skin. Emulsions possess a
certain degree of elegance and are easily washed off whenever desired. They
also have a high ability to penetrate the skin. In addition, the formulator can
control the viscosity, appearance, and degree of greasiness of cosmetic or
dermatological emulsions. Oil-in-water emulsions are most useful as water
washable drug bases and for general cosmetic purposes, while water-in-oil
emulsions are employed more widely for the treatment of dry skin and emollient
applications. Gels for dermatological use have several favorable properties
such as being thixotropic, greaseless, easily
spreadable, easily removable, emollient, nonstaining,
compatible with several excipients, and water-soluble
or miscible. The rheological properties and the breakdown behaviour of gels
filled with emulsions droplets can be varied by changing the interactions
between oil droplets and gel matrix, the oil content and the oil droplet size.
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
Materials:
Itraconazole was obtaines as a gift sample from Gufic
Bioscience Ltd Mumbai, Carbopol 934, Carbopol 940, Light liquid paraffin, Tween
20, Span 20, propylene glycol, methyl paraben and propyl paraben were purchased
from lobaie chemicals, Mumbai. Ethanol was procured
from Rajarambapu College of Pharmacy, Kasegaon. Double distilled water was used for all
experiment. All chemicals were pharmaceutical grade and used without further
modification.
Preparation
of gellified emulsion Itraconazole:
Gellified Emulsion
was prepared. The Gel in formulations were prepared by dispersing Carbopol 934 in purified water with constant stirring at a
moderate speed and Carbopol 940 In purified water
with constant stirring at a moderate
speed then the pH are adjusted to 6 to 6.5using Tri EthanolAmine
(TEA). The oil phase of the emulsion were prepared by dissolving Span 20in
light liquid paraffin while the aqueous phase was prepared by dissolving Tween 20 in purified water. Methyl and Propyl
paraben was dissolved in propylene glycol whereas
drug (Itraconazole)was
dissolved in ethanol and both solutions was mixed with the aqueous phase. Both
the oily and aqueous phases were separately heated to 70° to 80°C; then the
oily phase were added to The aqueous phase with continuous stirring until
cooled to room temperature. And add Glutaraldehyde in
during of mixing of gel and emulsioin1:1and to obtain the Gellified
Emulsion
Emulgel
preparation:
|
Contents |
F1 |
F2 |
F3 |
F4 |
F5 |
|
Itraconazole |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
Carbopol 940 |
1 |
1.5 |
2 |
- |
- |
|
carbopol 934 |
1 |
1.5 |
2 |
- |
- |
|
Span 20 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
|
Tween 20 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
Liquid paraffin |
7.5 |
7.5 |
7.5 |
7.5 |
7.5 |
|
Propylene glycol |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
|
Methyl paraben |
0.03 |
0.03 |
0.03 |
0.03 |
0.03 |
|
Propyl paraben |
0.02 |
0.02 |
0.02 |
0.02 |
0.02 |
|
Water |
q.s |
q.s |
q.s |
q.s |
q.s |
|
Contents |
F6 |
F7 |
F8 |
F9 |
|
Itraconazole |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
Carbopol 940 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
carbopol 934 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Span 20 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
|
Tween 20 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
Liquid paraffin |
7.5 |
7.5 |
7.5 |
7.5 |
|
Propylene glycol |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
|
Methyl paraben |
0.03 |
0.03 |
0.03 |
0.03 |
|
Propyl paraben |
0.02 |
0.02 |
0.02 |
0.02 |
|
Water |
q.s |
q.s |
q.s |
q.s |
Characterization of Emulgel
Physical
appearance:
The prepared Itraconazoleemulgel formulations were inspected visually
for their color, homogeneity, consistency and pH. The
pH values of 1% aqueous solutions of the prepared emulgel
were measured by a pH meter (Digital ph meter)
|
Formulation
table |
pH |
|
F1 |
5.80 |
|
F2 |
7.70 |
|
F3 |
6.4 |
|
F4 |
5.65 |
|
F5 |
6.65 |
|
F6 |
6.8 |
|
F7 |
6.4 |
|
F8 |
7.0 |
|
F9 |
6.9 |
Spreadability:
One of the criteria for an emulgel
to meet the ideal quantities is that it should possess good spreadability.
It is term expressed to denote the extent of area to which gel readily spread
on application to skin or affected part. The therapeutic efficacy of a
formulation also depends upon its spreading value. Spreadability
is expressed in terms of time in seconds taken by two slides to slip off from emulgel and placed in between the slides under the
direction of certain load. It is calculated by using the formula.
|
Formulation
code |
Diameter(cm) |
|
F1 |
4.2 |
|
F2 |
4.7 |
|
F3 |
5.8 |
|
F4 |
4.2 |
|
F5 |
4.5 |
|
F6 |
5.5 |
|
F7 |
4.8 |
|
F8 |
5.0 |
|
F9 |
4.8 |
Rheological Study:
The viscosity of different emulgel
formulation was determined at 250oC using a brook field viscometer
(Brookfield DV-E viscometer). The emulgel were
rotated at 10 (min.) and 100 (max.) rotation per minute with spindle 4
|
Formulation
batch |
Spindal no |
RPM |
Viscosity |
|
(centipoise) |
|||
|
F1 |
6 |
5 |
88000 |
|
F2 |
5 |
5 |
87000 |
|
F3 |
4 |
10 |
94000 |
|
F4 |
6 |
5 |
91000 |
|
F5 |
6 |
5 |
89000 |
|
F6 |
6 |
5 |
92000 |
|
F7 |
6 |
5 |
93000 |
|
F8 |
6 |
5 |
91000 |
|
F9 |
6 |
5 |
90000 |
Drug Content Determination:
Drug concentration in emulgel
was measured by UV spectrophotometer. Itroconazole
content in emulgel was measured by dissolving Known
quantity of emulgel in solvent (methanol) by
Sonication. Absorbance was measured after suitable dilution at 226 nm in UV/VIS
spectrophotometer (UV-1800, Shimadzu Corporation, Japan).
|
Formulation
code |
Drug content
% |
|
F1 |
82.85 |
|
F2 |
85.76 |
|
F3 |
94.97 |
|
F4 |
85.76 |
|
F5 |
91.37 |
|
F6 |
78.57 |
|
F7 |
92.67 |
|
F8 |
90.86 |
|
F9 |
84.86 |
In Vitro Release Study:
Diffusion cell (with effective diffusion area 3.14 cm2 and
15.5 ml cell volume) was used for the drug release studies. Emulgel
(200 mg) was applied onto the surface of egg membrane evenly. The egg membrane
was clamped between the donor and the receptor chamber of diffusion cell. The
receptor chamber was filled with freshly prepared PBS (pH 5.5) solution to solubilize the drug. The receptor chamber was stirred by
magnetic stirrer. The samples (1.0 ml aliquots) were collectedat
suitable time interval. Samples were analyzed for drug content by UV visible
spectrophotometer at 226 nm after appropriate dilutions. Cumulative corrections
were made to obtain the total amount of drug release at each time interval .The
cumulative amount of drug released across the egg membrane was determined as a
function of time.
|
Time |
F1 |
F2 |
F3 |
F4 |
F5 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
1 |
11 |
13.36 |
12.29 |
13.23 |
11.23 |
|
2 |
12.26 |
14.28 |
15.95 |
16.55 |
15.45 |
|
3 |
13.63 |
15.43 |
24.88 |
25.11 |
17.45 |
|
4 |
13.77 |
17.23 |
27.38 |
30.23 |
19.66 |
|
5 |
14.6 |
18.31 |
31.1 |
31.22 |
21.45 |
|
6 |
15.62 |
19.32 |
31.13 |
32.44 |
24.15 |
|
7 |
16.21 |
21.43 |
33.81 |
33.14 |
29.44 |
|
8 |
17.38 |
23.35 |
36.35 |
35.65 |
32.63 |
|
9 |
21.22 |
26.43 |
39.7 |
40.36 |
35.62 |
|
10 |
23.41 |
29.33 |
43.61 |
45.64 |
38.47 |
|
11 |
27.06 |
32.21 |
46.97 |
47.88 |
43.49 |
|
12 |
30.61 |
33.36 |
56.83 |
51.42 |
49.8 |
|
13 |
33.41 |
36.55 |
61.77 |
58.23 |
53.11 |
|
14 |
35.76 |
40.22 |
65.12 |
62.33 |
55.87 |
|
15 |
41.01 |
43.48 |
77.76 |
66.54 |
61.44 |
|
16 |
44.63 |
48.55 |
79.33 |
67.88 |
63.32 |
|
17 |
47.4 |
52.33 |
81.37 |
71.23 |
67.99 |
|
18 |
51.45 |
59.44 |
84 |
74.65 |
69.74 |
|
19 |
55.96 |
61.22 |
86.27 |
78.99 |
71.44 |
|
20 |
57.7 |
65.33 |
87.38 |
80.12 |
74.23 |
|
21 |
60.12 |
67.32 |
91.13 |
82.33 |
77.45 |
|
Time |
F6 |
F7 |
F8 |
F9 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
1 |
10.23 |
9.6 |
12.3 |
10.36 |
|
2 |
13.32 |
15.23 |
19.65 |
20.64 |
|
3 |
15.3 |
18.25 |
20.36 |
21.33 |
|
4 |
17.45 |
19.66 |
24.56 |
23.54 |
|
5 |
22.32 |
23.14 |
26.33 |
25.88 |
|
6 |
25.46 |
27.45 |
29.65 |
30.21 |
|
7 |
28.45 |
33.32 |
31.24 |
32.69 |
|
8 |
31.26 |
38.77 |
34.55 |
33.14 |
|
9 |
37.45 |
41.56 |
39.64 |
40.55 |
|
10 |
40.45 |
45.69 |
43.12 |
45.64 |
|
11 |
44.12 |
48.99 |
48.21 |
47.98 |
|
12 |
50.16 |
49.77 |
53.54 |
50.12 |
|
13 |
52.36 |
53.26 |
56.37 |
53.11 |
|
14 |
58.79 |
59.69 |
59.47 |
60.21 |
|
15 |
63.79 |
64.35 |
63.24 |
62.36 |
|
16 |
67.96 |
68.97 |
65.88 |
65.55 |
|
17 |
75.88 |
73.26 |
69.57 |
67.99 |
|
18 |
78.46 |
79.48 |
70.14 |
70.45 |
|
19 |
80.23 |
82.54 |
72.45 |
72.36 |
|
20 |
82.31 |
84.56 |
72.8 |
74.65 |
|
21 |
84.13 |
86.33 |
74.14 |
76.98 |
Skin irritation test:
A 0.5 gm sample of the test article was then applied to
each site (two sites per rabbit) by introduction under a double gauze layer to
an area of skin approximately 1” x 1” (2,54 x 2,54 cm) square. The emulgel re applied on the skin of rabbit. Animals were
returned to their cages. After a 24 hour exposure, the emulgel
are removed. The test sites were wiped with tap water to remove any remaining
test article residue.
Stability studies:
The prepared Itraconazole emulgel formulations were stored away from light in collapsible
tube at 25±2°C, 40±2°C and 4±2°C for 3 months. After storage, the samples are
tested for their physical appearance, pH, rheological behavior, drug release,
skin irritation test and microbiological assay.
|
Sr no. |
Properties |
Observation |
|
1 |
Color (Initial ) |
White |
|
2 |
Color (After one month) |
White |
|
3 |
pH (Initial ) |
6.5 |
|
4 |
pH (After one month) |
6.5 |
|
5 |
% drug content |
92% |
RESULTS:
Physical examination: The prepared Itraconazole emulgel formulations
were white viscous creamy preparation with a smooth and homogeneous appearance.
The pH values of all prepared formulation ranged from 5.4 to 5.8, which are
considered acceptable to avoid the risk of irritation upon application to the
skin because adult skin pH is 5.5.
Spreadability:
The values of spreadability
indicate that the emulgel is easily spreadable by
small amount of shear. Spreadability of F3 was
5.7.cm/sec, indicating spreadability of emulgel containing itroconazole
was good as compared to the marketed gel.
Fig 1- Spreadability of the various emulgel
formulations (Mean ± S.D.)
Rheological studies:
The measurement of viscosity of the prepared emulgel was done with Brookfield viscometer (Brookfield
DV-E viscometer). The highest viscosity was found in Emulgel
F3 it may be due to low level of the liquid paraffin concentration and
emulsifying agent concentration. The lowest viscosity was found in formulation F2 .
Fig 2- Viscosity
of itraconazole emulgel
(Mean ± S.D.)
Drug content determination:
The drug content in emulgel was
found in range of 78.87 ± 1.82% to 94.28± 1.20%. The higher drug content found
in F4 i.e. 94.28 ± 1.20% it may be due to the concentration of liquid paraffin.
Drug Release:
The in vitro release profiles of Itraconazole
from its various emulgel formulations are represented
in fig. The better release of the drug from all emulgel
formulation can be observed and the emulgel
formulation can be ranked in the following descending order Where the amounts
of the drug released after 21 hours were 60.12 %, 67.32%, 91.13%, 82.33%,
77.45%, 84.13%, 86.33%, 74.14% and 76.98%
respectively.
Stability studies:
Stability studies of optimized formulation were performed
as per ICH guideline (International Conference on Harmonization). It can be
observed that the emulgel formulation showed no major
alteration in relation to the pH, microbiological study, consistency, skin
irritation test and in vitro release study. The formulation shows stability for
the period of 3 months. No significant changes in the pH of formulations were
observed for 3 months in all storage conditions.
DISCUSSION:
The drug Itraconazole is
antifungal drug with wide spectrum of antifungal activity. The physical
appearance and melting point of drug were found to be concordant with that
mentioned in USP (2002), which shows purity of sample. Solubility of Itraconazole was determined in various aqueous and non
aqueous solvents. The drug was found to be freely soluble in methylene chloride, soluble in methanol, sparingly soluble
in ethanol, and slightly soluble in PBS (pH 5.5), and insoluble in water. The λmax for drug in PBS (pH 5.5) was 226 nm. The spreadability of formulations ranges from 4.1±0.95g.cm/sec
to 5.7±1.17 g.cm/sec. The higher spreadability of emulgel formulation (F3) is 5.7±0.84 g.cm/sec. It may be
due to the low concentration of emulsifying agent added in this formulation.
The highest viscosity was found in Emulgel F3 it may
be due to low level of the liquid paraffin concentration and emulsifying agent
concentration. The drug content in emulgel is 78.57±
1.82 % to 94.98 ± 1.20 %. The higher drug content determination
in emulgel F3 are 94.98± 1.20 %. The higher
drug release observed with formulations F3. This finding may be due to presence
of liquid paraffin in its low level and the emulsifying agent in its low
level/high level respectively, which lead to an increase in the hydrophilicity of the emulgel,
which, in turn, facilitates penetration of the release medium into the emulgel and diffusion of the drug from the emulgel. The percentage inhibition was taken as a measure
of antifungal activity of the drug. The emulgel
formulations were found to have the same rank order in their antifungal
activities as in the in vitro release studies. Thus, the highest activity was
observed formula, where the percentage inhibition found to be 47.5 ±1.15 % and
46.6 ± 1.34 % respectively. The Primary
Irritation of the emulgel formulation was calculated
and found to be nil. The formulations found to be stable for period of 3
months; it can be observed that the emulgel
formulation showed no major alteration in relation to the pH consistency, skin
irritation test and in vitro release study. The prepared formulation (emulgel) show better release profile than marketed
preparation. Emulgel will act as depot of drug which
releases drug in sustained manner. Hence the optimized formulation may be used
to treat the topical fungal diseases.
REFERENCES:
1.
Mohamad MI,
Optimization of chlorphenesin emulgel
formulation. The AAPS journal, 6(3):1-5, (2004).
2.
Kumar L, Verma R, In vitro
evaluation of topical gel prepared using natural polymer. Int
J drug deli, 2:58-63, (2010).
3.
Mitkari BV, Korde SA, Mahadik KR, Kokare CR, Formulation and evaluation of topical liposomal
gel for Fluconazole. Indian journal of pharmaceutical
education and research, 44(4):324-329, (2010).
4.
Kshirsagar N A. Drug
Delivery Systems. Ind. J. Pharmacol. 2000; 32:S54-
S61.
5.
Rashmi M. Topical gel: A review august
vol. 2008; available from http://www.pharmainfo.com
6.
Sharma S.
Topical preparations are used for the localized effects at the site of their
application by virtue of drug penetration into the underlying layers of skin or
mucous membranes. Pharmaceutical reviews 2008; 6:1
7.
Gupta A, Mishra AK, Singh AK, Gupta V, Bansal
P. Formulation and evaluation of topical gel of diclofenac
sodium using different polymers. Drug Invention Today 2010; 2:250-253.
8.
Rieger MM, Lachman
L, Lieberman HA, Kanig JL. The Theory and Practice of
Industrial Pharmacy. 3rd ed., PA Lea and Febiger,
Philadelphia; 1986. pp. 502-533
9.
Stanos SP. Topical Agents for the
Management of Musculoskeletal Pain. J Pain Symptom Manage 2007; 33.
10.
Stanos SP. Topical Agents for the
Management of Musculoskeletal Pain .J Pain Symptom Manage March 2007; 33.
11.
Jain A, Deveda P, Vyas N, Chauhan J et al. Development of Antifungal Emulsion Based
Gel For Topical Fungal Infection(S). IJPRD 2011;
2(12).
12.
Djordjevic J, Michniak B, Uhrich, Kathryn E
AAPS PharmSciTech 2003; 5(4):1-12.
13.
Lachman, L.; Lieberman, H.A. The Theory
and Practice of Industrial Pharmacy. 3rd Ed. Varghese Publishing house; 1990.
pp. 534.
14.
Bonacucina G, Cespi M, Palmieri GF.
Characterization and Stability of Emulsion Gels Based on Acrylamide/Sodium
Acryloyldimethyl Taurate
Copolymer AAPS Pharm Sci Tech.
June 2009; 10 (2).
15.
Curr AEB. Transdermal
Drug Delivery: Penetration Enhancement Technique Heather. Drug Deliv. 2005; 2:23-33.
16.
Chaudhari P, Ajab A, Malpure P, Kolsure P, Sanap D, Development
and in-vitro evaluation of thermo reversible nasal gel formulations of Rizatriptan benzoate, Indian J.Pharm
Edu. Res., 2009; 43: 55-62.
17.
Masmoudi H, Piccerelle P, Le Dréau Y, Kister J. A rheological method to evaluate the physical
stability of highly viscous pharmaceutical oil-in-water emulsions. Pharm Res 2006;23 8:1937–47
18.
Mortazavi SA, Aboofazeli R. An Investigation into the Effect of Various
Penetration Enhancers on Percutaneous Absorption of Piroxicam. Iranian Journal of Pharmaceutical Research 2003;
135-140.
19.
Zhang XL,
Zhao R, Qian W. Preparation of an emulgel
for treatment of aphthous ulcer on the basis of carbomers. Chin. Pharm. J.1995; 30:417-418.
20.
Gaur PK, Mishra S, Purohit S, Dave K. Transdermal Drug Delivery System: A Review. AJPCR 2009; 2:
14-20.
Received on 05.03.2015 Accepted on 10.04.2015
© Asian Pharma
Press All Right Reserved
Asian J. Pharm.
Tech. 2015; Vol. 5: Issue 2, Pg
91-96
DOI: 10.5958/2231-5713.2015.00014.8